SaaS + Sales Performance Management = Recession Resilience

With recession alarm bells going off all over the world, smart managers are looking for ways to make their businesses more recession resilient. Reducing your cost base, making sure you have operational flexibility, and boosting employee productivity are three well-proven tactics. Software as a Service (SaaS) wasn’t an option during the last recession. But SaaS has established a track record over the past several years, decisively proving its value in supporting the first two tactics: cutting costs and increasingly flexibility. And what’s valuable in the best of times can prove priceless in the worst of times.

You know the litany. In contrast to on-premise enterprise software, SaaS means no upfront hardware and software costs, no worrying about costly ongoing software maintenance, and no vendor lock in. Instead of being tied to an expensive software infrastructure, you’re free to quickly implement changes. And if a SaaS vendor doesn’t perform, you’re free to immediately choose one that will and be up and running in a matter of weeks. Believe me, savvy SaaS vendors know this. Subscriber retention is one of our key success metrics, along with speedy initial implementation and the ability to quickly deliver innovative new functionality.

So, while SaaS delivers lower costs and enhanced flexibility, where does that leave employee and business productivity? Obviously, not all software applications—SaaS or on-premise—deliver equal productivity boosts, at least not of the kind that directly impact the bottom line. Yet some categories excel in their ability to do so, including Sales Performance Management (SPM) applications. In a recession, businesses need to invest in getting the most profit possible out of their front-line employees. SPM applications provide this value by helping align sales behaviors to corporate objectives, focusing reps on the most strategic sales, maximizing agility in the face of market change, and providing visibility into sales success drivers through comprehensive analytics. And along the way, they help greatly reduce administrative time and costs, and support compliance efforts.

The last recession was a boom time for early-generation SPM applications—and that was even before the advent of SaaS. Today, thanks to the SaaS model, the SPM arena is expanding in scope like never before, and SPM functionality such as on-demand sales compensation management is finally affordable to companies of any size.

SaaS plus SPM delivers a genuine double whammy in the face of recession: SaaS economic value combined with SPM strategic business value. It just makes good business sense, whether you are managing in a recession or in a vibrant high-growth economy.

SaaS 2.0? Predictions for the year ahead.

2007 was a momentous year for Software as a Service (SaaS), as it emerged as a disruptive force in an increasingly complacent industry. And while it would be easy to say that growing customer interest will propel SaaS to new heights in 2008, I believe there’s something going on right now that is about more than mere market momentum. From my viewpoint, SaaS is becoming increasingly savvy, and it isn’t too far-fetched to think we’ll soon being talking in terms of SaaS 2.0.

Here’s what I mean. In 2007, we were still witnessing the first generation of many SaaS solutions. Their limited functionality led to criticism that they weren’t as robust as their enterprise software counterparts. In 2008, we will see more SaaS companies building out or partnering to provide more robust solutions and platforms, along the lines of salesforce.com’s Force.com platform.

This is already happening in the market in which Xactly competes, as Incentive Compensation Management (ICM) offerings are morphing into full-blown Sales Performance Management (SPM) solutions, with rich analytics and functionality such as territory and quota management.

Just as exciting to me, SaaS will breathe new life into struggling enterprise software sectors in 2008, and will create entirely new sectors by lowering the cost of entry vis a vis traditional software models. This is huge. And the fast-expanding SPM segment is proof that it is starting to happen.

At the same time, SaaS will create entirely new ecosystems. In 2007, we witnessed the delivery of mash-ups combining data and SaaS functionality via single sign-on. In 2008, we will see SaaS companies supporting end-to-end processes and seamless user experiences through deep integration, software suites, or partnerships.

And through it all, SaaS vendors will only get smarter about customer needs. The advantage of managing all customer deployments under a single umbrella, as SaaS vendors do, is that we are better able to find common threads across customer problems, needs and desires. And customers don’t have to wait for the next release cycle—which, in the enterprise software world can mean waiting a year or more—for a SaaS vendor to implement major fixes and changes across the board. In fact, SaaS vendors are free to be innovative and practically impelled to deliver ever more value, because we are developing a single line of code for one platform shared by all users.

Finally, in 2008, Wall Street will increasingly wake up to SaaS as we witness an up-tick in SaaS IPOs, despite the down market predicted for the first half of the year. The recent successful IPO of Xactly partner and customer, SuccessFactors, is likely a harbinger of things to come. Along these lines, Wall Street bankers, investors and enterprise customers will come to see the distinction between tactical SaaS applications that conveniently automate non-mission critical business functions like recruiting versus truly strategic SaaS applications like SPM, which are at the center of driving business growth and profits.

Okay, I admit to a bias. But, as the SaaS industry matures, I firmly believe it will continue to burn a hole right through traditional software models throughout the rest of this decade and beyond. Whether we call it SaaS 2.0 or not, the SaaS we’ll come to know in 2008 will be light-years ahead of the SaaS we knew in 2007— in terms of functionality, robustness and appeal and, most importantly, in its ability to game-change a customer’s competitiveness and profit picture.

Customers Take the Wheel

It’s no secret there’s a sea change occurring in enterprise software, as “on-premise” increasingly gives way to “on-demand.” What’s not so evident yet is the shift in power from the vendor to the customer that is occurring as a result of the on-demand revolution. In a recent article posted on ebizQ, I discuss how the growing popularity of on-demand SaaS applications will lead to a more customer-centric and responsive software industry. This is because in the on-demand world, the customer is firmly in the driver’s seat and can pull the plug on the vendor at any time. As opposed to on-premise software implementations, on-demand implementations have no expensive infrastructures and no sunk costs that lock customers in and limit their flexibility to make a change.

Nevertheless, customers need to step warily. As more and more large enterprise software companies test out the SaaS waters with initial on-demand offerings, there’s no guarantee they will support their on-demand customers properly. After decades of locking customers into expensive on-premise software and subjecting them to lengthy implementation cycles and costly upgrades, who’s to say these companies can suddenly and successfully shift gears and become paragons of customer care?

Then there are those vendors who are trying to cash in on the on-demand cachet by offering “hosted on-demand” applications that are really just the same old on-premise applications running remotely, and which have few of the advantages of a genuine on-demand application built on a multi-tenant SaaS model. There are some rude shocks just around the corner for the customers of these guys, who by blurring the truth are setting themselves up to disappoint their clientele.

So as you slide into the driver’s seat and take the wheel in the brave new on-demand world, how do you make sure you’re not going to be fooled and are indeed going to get all the value that you expect? In the ebizQ article, I posit a brief checklist to help customers navigate the maze of on-demand claims and promises. Like any good driver, you’ll want to run down such a list before turning the key. Check out the full article here, and let me know what you think: www.ebizq.net/topics/bpm/features/8567.html

Connect the Dots between Pre- and Post-Sales Processes

I’ve written before in this space about the natural synergies that exist between CRM and sales compensation management applications. Pre- and post-sales visibility/automation are truly just different sides of the same sales performance management coin. In an article recently written for CustomerThink.com, I discuss these synergies in depth, and show how one company has been able to extend its CRM investment in a powerful way.

Specifically, the company has linked its sales compensation management solution directly to its Salesforce implementation so that reps now run “what if” scenarios based on Salesforce CRM “live” opportunity data coupled with accurate compensation plan data from their Xactly Incent implementation. Notably, they are able to do it all within Salesforce CRM.

The big benefit is that the people in the field can now easily see where to direct their sales efforts for maximum commission payouts. As these payouts are a reflection of where the company wants them to put their best efforts, the whole business gains. That’s powerful stuff. And it’s something that any company with a Salesforce, RightNow, or Oracle Siebel CRM On Demand implementation is in a position to take advantage of. For the details, please read the full story at: www.customerthink.com/article/connect_dots_crm_sales_compensation

On-Demand in Demand as SAP Goes SaaS

If ever there needed to be a “big bang” validation of the software-as-a-service (SaaS) concept, then SAP’s September 19 unveiling of its Business ByDesign on-demand software for midsize companies surely suffices. Not only is SAP the first major enterprise software player to get serious about SaaS, it is the absolute largest enterprise software player and its move is thus freighted with significance.

But there really doesn’t have to be a big-bang validation of SaaS. Many thousands of customers are endorsing the concept every day as they leverage SaaS offerings, and will continue to do so in increasing numbers, with or without the help of traditional enterprise software companies. It is not SAP nor any other huge software company that will drive SaaS. It is the customers who are in the driver’s seat, and SAP is wisely reacting to this fact. And now SAP will have to meet these customers’ expectations—expectations built up by trail-blazing, 100 percent SaaS companies like salesforce.com, NetSuite and Xactly.

There’s no doubt that SAP’s on-demand offerings have the potential to provide immense value to the targeted customers—SaaS delivery coupled with SAP functionality packs a powerful punch. But SAP is not about to abandon its on-premise model anytime soon, and its management will be wrestling for some time with such issues as how to keep from cannibalizing its bread-and-butter software licensing revenues and how to successfully support two entirely different delivery models. And along the way, they will learn what 100 percent SaaS companies have known from the start: If you don’t meet the expectations of SaaS customers, they can cut you off in an instant, no questions asked. That’s not something that enterprise software vendors, with their long-term licenses and claws sunk deeply into their customers’ costly IT infrastructures, have traditionally needed to deal with.

Still, SAP is doing the smart thing by getting started in SaaS now, when it can be lifted by the rising SaaS tide. In doing so, SAP will add to the tide by increasing the portfolio of software functionality available to customers on demand. SAP’s move doesn’t prove that SaaS is viable. That’s already established. What it really demonstrates is that the traditional enterprise software model is not all that viable for most companies. And for that we welcome SAP to the SaaS world.

Buyer Beware: “Hosted On-Demand” Is No More Than a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Reeling from tight IT budgets and the consequent popularity of new software-as-a-service (SaaS) offerings, many enterprise software vendors are casting around for ways to dress up their own offerings and perhaps cash in on the cachet of SaaS and on-demand delivery. What several have come up with is the “hosted on-demand” label, which in reality is nothing more than draping the tired old enterprise software wolf in ill-fitting sheep’s clothing. As I’ve said before, enterprise software by any name, hosted or otherwise, is not a substitute for true on-demand. Software vendors taking this re-labeling route are doing a colossal disservice to customers, whether those customers buy into the name game or not.

So, what does “hosted on-demand” have to offer? Disappointments, mostly. What these vendors are doing is simply providing the same old premise-based software in a hosted environment, coupled with a seemingly substantial—but not nearly substantial enough—price break. And under the fleece is the same old ravening wolf. Hosted or not, these are still expensive solutions to implement, and shaving 30 percent or even 40 percent off the typically enormous up-front implementation cost doesn’t change that fact—and there’s still the monthly fees for accessing the hosted software to contend with. These are also typically complicated and inflexible solutions and just because they are now off-premise doesn’t necessarily change that fact.

What may well change, however, is a customer’s support priority. With two models to support—on-premise and hosted—there’s an almost invariable dilution of resources. Which customers do you think a traditional enterprise software company is most likely to make its top priority? And for that matter, what about new functionality, version control, reliability and scalability? On-premise and “hosted on-demand” implementations are identical in that each customer is a discrete box, or technology platform—it’s just that in a hosted implementation, that box has been moved off-site. But with a true on-demand solution, all customers share the exact-same platform. Just as they all share the same low cost-base, they all benefit equally from more rapid introduction of new functionality as well as from identically robust version control, data security, disaster recovery and scalability. In numbers, there is strength.

So buyer beware. Don’t be misled by labels. If you want on-demand, go with pure on-demand solutions, 100 percent purpose built to deliver the full benefits of SaaS. Avoid the nasty shock of being fleeced, and let the wolves go howl.

SaaS IPO Tipping Point?

Could the NetSuite IPO be the beacon for a sea of change between Software as a Service companies and Wall Street? Are the days of trepidation for the SaaS business model, security and viability waning?

As I watch the revenue and sheer number of customers for on-demand companies like Salary.com, DemandTec and NetSuite amass—I say yes. All three companies are demonstrating to the market the benefits of this efficient and cost-effective model and calling Wall Street to attention.

Sure, a lot of companies are founded on a pure SaaS model, but relatively few have reached the public markets successfully. Why is this? It’s because many people are still struggling to understand the SaaS model and failing to truly grasp the fundamental differences between SaaS-based and on-premise software offerings. Investors can't look at SaaS companies through the same lenses they have used for years with traditional enterprise software companies. When I talk to investors, I tell them to focus on two main differences: customer renewal and the revenue dynamic.

First, recognize that SaaS companies are built from the ground up around customer satisfaction and customer renewal. To survive, they must earn the customer’s complete satisfaction every year, and often, every month. This focus is very different from traditional software companies whose first priority is to get to the next million dollar license deal in order to keep Wall Street happy, and whose second priority is to have these customers pay expensive ongoing maintenance and upgrade fees.

The second major difference: because there is no million dollar license fee, the revenue trails traditional software companies. This is actually great for investors because revenue SaaS companies earn is not an artifact from a relatively few very large deals, it comes from hundreds and hundreds of happy customers. This revenue dynamic is also the reason SaaS companies are so attractive and so much more predictable to Wall Street.

Because of the business model differences, it takes a little longer for SaaS vendors to ramp to the revenues that will justify an IPO, but—have no doubt—they are getting there fast. Salary.com, DemandTec and Netsuite are proving that it can be done and are helping to move the SaaS IPO market forward.

From a customer perspective, why SaaS and why now? SaaS offers customers an undisputable value and time to market advantage over traditional enterprise models, including no hardware, no maintenance fees, minimal implementation fees and, most importantly, no software upgrades. This means new features are available to customers instantaneously, as soon as they are live, saving customers from expensive upgrade costs while ensuring they’ll never trail behind on older releases of software.

SaaS is also breathing new life into technologies that were too expensive for the masses in a traditional enterprise model. The fast growing Sales Performance Management market is living proof. Founded on a pure on-demand or SaaS model, Xactly Corporation has quickly amassed more than 70 customers including Salesforce.com, CNet and Polycom—all of whom are now utilizing an on-demand Sales Performance Management platform to create a strategic competitive advantage within their businesses.

For companies like Xactly and investors in the market, the SaaS IPO tipping point may very well be here, and I think it’s about time.